Knowledge Base
- CCTV Demo Suite
- Security hot topics
- Security articles
- CCTV channel discussion
- Controlware making waves
- Open networking standards for CCTV products deliver real benefits
- CCTV video image quality is everything
- Genetec's Security Center Federation
- CCTV via an IP network
- UK CCTV regulation
- Bandwidth optimisation for IP CCTV
- CCTV systems are improved with IP
- Open CCTV software
- H.264 compression benefits
- Select IP based CCTV systems
- CCTV security Consultants
- Is IP CCTV cost competitive?
- The problem with CCTV recording
- How much does IP CCTV cost?
- CCTV video compression
- Ask a question about security
MPEG-4 CCTV video compression
MPEG-4 is a compression standard that was introduced in late 1998 by the Moving Picture Experts Group. In video surveillance applications MPEG-4 Part 2, also known as MPEG-4 Visual is the version of MPEG-4 most commonly used. MPEG-4 supports both low-bandwidth applications and those applications that require high quality images, with virtually unlimited bandwidth and no limitations in frame-rate. Typically most MPEG-4 based encoders and cameras support video up to DVD quality.
MPEG-4 is much more efficient than M-JPEG because video frames are analysed prior to being sent across the network. The first compressed image (I frame) is used as a reference point, the following images only contain information that differs to the initial I frame reference image. Periodically I frames are transmitted within the video sequence to ensure a recent reference point. The distance between these I frames is known as the GOP (Group of Pictures). The distance between I frames is usually user definable depending on the application and activity in the scene. For example a 25 FPS video stream with a GOP of 50 would mean a new I frame with GOP change information is sent every 2 seconds. The viewing application on the receiving end of the transmission then reconstructs all images based on this information and displays the video.
Advantages
- Uses less network bandwidth when compared with M-JPEG
- MPEG-4 up to 5 times more efficient than M-JPEG at low bandwidths
- Reduces the amount of storage needed compared with M-JPEG at higher frame rates
- Increases the amount of time video can be stored compared with M-JPEG
- Very efficient at high frame rates
Disadvantages
- Low efficiency at very low frame-rates or extremely high scene activity
- Can be liable to “blurring” on freeze frame or very high motion
- When the bit-rate is limited video quality suffers

Your Contact
Controlware
UK Phone: 0844 225 9 225
Int. Phone: +44 (0)1635 884800
Fax: +44 (0)1635 46177
email: video(at)controlware.co.uk